<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>/en/rss/technology/mrtp/</title>
		<link>http://www.miure.pl/en/technology/mrtp//</link>
		<language>en</language>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 16:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:01:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Jinks 2.0</generator>
		<webMaster>webmaster@miure.pl</webMaster>
		<ttl>1440</ttl>
		<item>
			<title>/en/rss/technology/mrtp/</title>
			<link>http://www.miure.pl/en/technology/mrtp/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[
Problem of application of WiFi technology in point-to-point links
Low throughout caused by suboptimal utilisation of transmission time

The most often advertised parameter of wireless comminication technology is
throughtput of physical layer. However, the most important paremeter for the
user - effective throughtput - rarely achieves such high values. It is caused
by necessity of utilisation of transmission channel for purposes different from
transmission of data.

IEEE 802.11 Standard assumes sharing of a medium by multiple stations. As a
result some amount of time must be devoted for realization of mechanisms of
multiple access and collision avoidance.

Due to relatively high susceptibility of radio communication to interference
and resulting packet losses, system of acknowledgment of packets delivery was
introduced in the Standard. It is beneficial for improvement of efficiency of
transmission most protocols used in the Internet. Nevertheless, double
transmission direction change is required in order to transmit short packet
carrying only information about receipt of a portion of data. Thus, additional
time is wasted.


Poor scalability with respect to distance

Application of a single channel in a two-way transmission (half-duplex mode)
requires pausing of sending until remote station stops transmission. In case of
connections established at long distances, propagation time must be taken into
account what leads to consequent decrease in effective throughput. What is
more, when delays connected with propagation of signal become comparable to
time intervals related to mechisms of access contention, probability of
collision resulting from errorneous assessment of channel as free increases.
That is why the efficiency of links in IEEE 802.11 technology falls as the
distance increases, regardless of signal strength.

Lack of dynamic selection of all transmission parameters

There exist implementations of IEEE 802.11 protocol selecting modulation and
parameters of forward error correction coding on the basis of analysis of lost
packet distributions. Such a technique is necessary for transmission speed
adoption to external conditions. Modulation, however, is not the only parameter
having impact on the quality of connection. Other important factors are also
transmission power and packet size.

It is obvious that too low transmission power used on a link with high
attenuation and interference may cause high packet losses. However, on a
low-attenuation link too high transmission power is undesirable because this
can cause limitation of efficincy due to packet losses.

Transmission of too short frames may unwillingly reduce link efficiency while
transmission of too long ones may make communication dramatically diffcult in
severe conditions.

Unfortunatelly, all devices accessible in the market working according to IEEE
802.11 Standard require manual setting of both parameters. Time-consuming
testing is needed for optimal realization of this process. Quick reaction to
changing conditions is practically impossible.

Solution - MRTP protocol

As Miure Duo was designed for fast transmission of data between distant
point-to-point links, a specialised transmission data protocol MRTP was created
which no longer works on the basis of flow control applied in WiFi, enabling an
achievement of maximum possible efficiency of radio interfaces used. It is
remarkable  within this class of devices. It was possible because of two
independent radio transmission paths and provision of our own unique techniques:


	fraggregation - technique thanks to which the size of frames sent by radio are set apart from user
	traffic
	asynchronous retransmission - notification about frame loss realized by means of separate transmssion
	path
	optimization of transmission parameters - optimal selection of modulation, frame size and transmission
	power on the basis of countinuously performed link quality probing


Fraggregation

One of the main assumptions established for development of MRTP protocol is
that radio frame size is an important parameter which should be set adaptively
to conditions in the transmission medium and should be independent of traffic
delivered by the user.

Utilisation of radio frame sizes up to over 4000 bytes (double of the normally
available) allows to increase the data transmission duty cycle, what positively
contributes to achieved throughput. Ethernet frames are usually at most 1518 bytes
long, therefore in order to construct large radio frames, they have to be
aggregated.

On the other hand, if external conditions cause smaller frames to make better
use of the link, there may turn up a need for fragmentation, i.e. splitting
user-delivered packets into smaller pieces.

Fraggregation is new term which describes a process simultaneous fragmentation
and aggregation of the packets. In contrary to separate use of these
techniques, fraggregation allows to fill whole available frame space with user
data. Thanks to this, if there is some free space remaining in the currently
fraggregated frame, but the whole user packet cannot fit there, it is split
into fragments. Then, one part fills the radio frame completely, while the
remaining packet fragment goes to the next radio frame.

Asynchronous retransmission

Short acknowledgement frames sent on the same channel as the data they refer to
are replaced by adding the information of unsuccessful reception to the
structure of the MRTP protocol. Besides decreasing of the overhead incurred by
the retransmission, we have gained the possibility of sending them using
different channel than the received data. This in turn enables to use each of
these channels for transmission of data in different directions (full-duplex
transmission), what eliminates the reason of low efficiency on long-range
links.

Optimization of transmission parameters

The implemented transmission parameter adaptation algorithm is the only
solution available in the market, which is able to perform simultaneous
selection of modulation scheme, frame size and transmission power in order to
achieve the highest efficiency and reliability under suboptimal conditions.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2>Problem of application of WiFi technology in point-to-point links</h2>
<h3>Low throughout caused by suboptimal utilisation of transmission time</h3>

<p>The most often advertised parameter of wireless comminication technology is
throughtput of physical layer. However, the most important paremeter for the
user - effective throughtput - rarely achieves such high values. It is caused
by necessity of utilisation of transmission channel for purposes different from
transmission of data.</p>

<p>IEEE 802.11 Standard assumes sharing of a medium by multiple stations. As a
result some amount of time must be devoted for realization of mechanisms of
multiple access and collision avoidance.</p>

<p>Due to relatively high susceptibility of radio communication to interference
and resulting packet losses, system of acknowledgment of packets delivery was
introduced in the Standard. It is beneficial for improvement of efficiency of
transmission most protocols used in the Internet. Nevertheless, double
transmission direction change is required in order to transmit short packet
carrying only information about receipt of a portion of data. Thus, additional
time is wasted.</p>


<h3>Poor scalability with respect to distance</h3>

<p>Application of a single channel in a two-way transmission (half-duplex mode)
requires pausing of sending until remote station stops transmission. In case of
connections established at long distances, propagation time must be taken into
account what leads to consequent decrease in effective throughput. What is
more, when delays connected with propagation of signal become comparable to
time intervals related to mechisms of access contention, probability of
collision resulting from errorneous assessment of channel as free increases.
That is why the efficiency of links in IEEE 802.11 technology falls as the
distance increases, regardless of signal strength.</p>

<h3>Lack of dynamic selection of all transmission parameters</h3>

<p>There exist implementations of IEEE 802.11 protocol selecting modulation and
parameters of forward error correction coding on the basis of analysis of lost
packet distributions. Such a technique is necessary for transmission speed
adoption to external conditions. Modulation, however, is not the only parameter
having impact on the quality of connection. Other important factors are also
transmission power and packet size.</p>

<p>It is obvious that too low transmission power used on a link with high
attenuation and interference may cause high packet losses. However, on a
low-attenuation link too high transmission power is undesirable because this
can cause limitation of efficincy due to packet losses.</p>

<p>Transmission of too short frames may unwillingly reduce link efficiency while
transmission of too long ones may make communication dramatically diffcult in
severe conditions.</p>

<p>Unfortunatelly, all devices accessible in the market working according to IEEE
802.11 Standard require manual setting of both parameters. Time-consuming
testing is needed for optimal realization of this process. Quick reaction to
changing conditions is practically impossible.</p>

<h2>Solution - MRTP protocol</h2>

<p>As Miure Duo was designed for fast transmission of data between distant
point-to-point links, a specialised transmission data protocol MRTP was created
which no longer works on the basis of flow control applied in WiFi, enabling an
achievement of maximum possible efficiency of radio interfaces used. It is
remarkable  within this class of devices. It was possible because of two
independent radio transmission paths and provision of our own unique techniques:</p>

<ul>
	<li><b>fraggregation</b> - technique thanks to which the size of frames sent by radio are set apart from user
	traffic</li>
	<li><b>asynchronous retransmission</b> - notification about frame loss realized by means of separate transmssion
	path</li>
	<li><b>optimization of transmission parameters</b> - optimal selection of modulation, frame size and transmission
	power on the basis of countinuously performed link quality probing</li>
</ul>

<h3>Fraggregation</h3>

<p>One of the main assumptions established for development of MRTP protocol is
that radio frame size is an important parameter which should be set adaptively
to conditions in the transmission medium and should be independent of traffic
delivered by the user.</p>

<p>Utilisation of radio frame sizes up to over 4000 bytes (double of the normally
available) allows to increase the data transmission duty cycle, what positively
contributes to achieved throughput. Ethernet frames are usually at most 1518 bytes
long, therefore in order to construct large radio frames, they have to be
aggregated.</p>

<p>On the other hand, if external conditions cause smaller frames to make better
use of the link, there may turn up a need for fragmentation, i.e. splitting
user-delivered packets into smaller pieces.</p>

<p>Fraggregation is new term which describes a process simultaneous fragmentation
and aggregation of the packets. In contrary to separate use of these
techniques, fraggregation allows to fill whole available frame space with user
data. Thanks to this, if there is some free space remaining in the currently
fraggregated frame, but the whole user packet cannot fit there, it is split
into fragments. Then, one part fills the radio frame completely, while the
remaining packet fragment goes to the next radio frame.</p>

<h3>Asynchronous retransmission</h3>

<p>Short acknowledgement frames sent on the same channel as the data they refer to
are replaced by adding the information of unsuccessful reception to the
structure of the MRTP protocol. Besides decreasing of the overhead incurred by
the retransmission, we have gained the possibility of sending them using
different channel than the received data. This in turn enables to use each of
these channels for transmission of data in different directions (full-duplex
transmission), what eliminates the reason of low efficiency on long-range
links.</p>

<h3>Optimization of transmission parameters</h3>

<p>The implemented transmission parameter adaptation algorithm is the only
solution available in the market, which is able to perform simultaneous
selection of modulation scheme, frame size and transmission power in order to
achieve the highest efficiency and reliability under suboptimal conditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

